Barbara May Bernhardt
School of Audiology and Speech Sciences
University of British Columbia
may.bernhardt@audiospeech.ubc.ca
|
|
Barbara May Bernhardt School of Audiology and Speech Sciences University of British Columbia may.bernhardt@audiospeech.ubc.ca |
| Participants: | 6 |
| Type of Study: | longitudinal treatment study |
| Location: | Vancouver, Canada |
| Media type: | not available |
| DOI: | doi:10.21415/T5FS35 |
Bernhardt, B. (1990). Application of nonlinear phonological theory to intervention with six phonologically disordered children. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of British Columbia (All 6 subjects). https://open.library.ubc.ca/cIRcle/collections/ubctheses/831/items/1. 0098745
Bernhardt, B. (1992). The application of nonlinear phonological
theory to intervention with one phonologically disordered child. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 6, 283-316.
(Subject 1).
Bernhardt, B., & Gilbert, J. (1992). Applying linguistic theory to
speech-language pathology: the case for nonlinear phonology. Clinical
Linguistics and Phonetics, 6, 123-145. (Subject 3).
Bernhardt, B. (1994). The prosodic tier and phonological disorders.
In M. Yavas (ed.) First and second language acquisition. (pp. 149-172).
San Diego, CA: Singular Press (Subject 4).
Bernhardt, B.H. & Stemberger, J.P. (2000). Workbook in nonlinear
phonology for clinical application (copyright with authors,
phonodevelopment.sites.olt.ubc.ca)
Bernhardt, B.M.H. & Stemberger, J.P. (1998). Handbook of
phonological development: From a nonlinear constraints-based
perspective. San Diego: Academic Press.
In accordance with TalkBank rules, any use of data from this corpus must cite Bernhardt (1990.)
Recordings for this project were carried out in a quiet room at a health centre. The data represent pre-intervention data (Sample 1), and 3 post-treatment samples. Three 6-week treatment blocks (three sessions per week) were conducted by Barbara May Bernhardt as her doctoral research and were based on nonlinear phonological analysis and treatment methods. Each child can be considered its own single case study although conditions were held constant and counterbalanced across subjects, and data were compared across subjects. Utterances were elicited in a play-based situation with toys and pictures in reaction to a 164-word list (Bernhardt, 1990 list). The productions are coded as spontaneous single words (no code), echoic (imitated) single words (E), delayed echoic single words (DE), prompted echoic single words (PE), self-echoic words (SE, DSE) and finally, words transcribed from connected speech (C).
| Participant Name* | Date of Birth | Age Range | Number of Sessions | Sex |
| Subject 1 (Charles) | 1982-06-07 | 5;10-6;04 | 4 | M |
| Subject 2 (Blair) | 1984-03-07 | 4;02-4;09 | 4 | M |
| Subject 3 (Jeremy) | 1985-04-07 | 3;04-3;10 | 4 | M |
| Subject 4 (Sean) | 1985-02-07 | 3;06-4;00 | 4 | M |
| Subject 5 (Gordon) | 1982-04-07 | 6;02-6;08 | 4 | M |
| Subject 6 (Chrissie) | 1985-07-07 | 2;10-3;04 | 4 | F |