Researchers can ask their subjects to approve or disapprove of a variety of options or levels for data access.
No restrictions placed. This level allows access
over the web to both transcripts and media without pseudonymization.
Pseudonymization of last names and
addresses. Participant's last names and information
regarding addresses or locations will be replaced by
pseudonyms in the transcripts. This preserves the bulk of
the interaction and requires only a bit of work to replace a
few words.
Fuller pseudonymization. In addition to
basic pseudonymization, we can also pseudonymize first
names. Because first names cannot uniquely identify an
individual, this is usually not important in terms of
maintaining privacy. However, it may be required in some
cases.
Audio bleeping. In addition to
pseudonymization, participants can request either partial or
full audio bleeping of pseudonyms.
Video blurring. In some cases, video
blurring may be requested. Blurring is technically quite
difficult to implement and highly disruptive of the data.
Therefore, it is usually better to protect sensitive video
data using other methods such as passwords, described below.
Currently, there are no TalkBank datasets that use video
blurring.
General password protection. Access to data may
be restricted to certain individuals or groups of
individuals. Currently, most of the clinical databanks use
a general password given out to all qualified researchers.
Restricted password protection. In
some cases, the contributor of data may wish to control
access to data themselves. In these cases, we create a
password, but it is up to the contributor to decide who
could know that password.
Embargo. If contributors need to publish
results before allowing access to their data, we can enter data into the
database, but provide no public access until the embargo period is over.
Non-disclosure form. For cases
requiring extreme protection, password protection can be
accompanied by signing of a non-disclosure form. This form
prohibits the publication of any reference that identifies
individuals. No copying of the data is allowed. No TalkBank
data are subject to this restriction.
Controlled viewing. This level of
access requires that data can only be viewed in controlled
conditions under direct on-line supervision. This level may be
needed for data of a highly personal or revealing nature.
Archiving only: These data would not be
viewable over the web, but would be archived in the format
of the general system for offline use. This level allows the
investigator to use the tools of the analysis system without
actually adding the data to the online database.
Some of these options can be combined. For example, options 2, 4 and 6 could be combined. However, one might think that invocation of option 6 would make options 2 and 4 irrelevant in terms of protection of privacy. Options 5 and 9 could theoretically be combined, but one would wonder why anyone would go to the work of video blurring if the data were not being made viewable.
None of these options specify a time at which the data will be destroyed. There are no plans for data destruction for TalkBank data.